What Is the Protein RDA and Why It’s Not Enough

Everyone knows that protein is important, but when it comes to how much protein per day we actually need, things quickly get confusing. Let’s take a look at the official recommendations and what they’re really meant to do. The protein RDA sounds authoritative, but once you dig into it, it becomes clear why so many leading voices in health and fitness recommend higher intakes to support strength, recovery, and long-term health.

The RDA for protein is set at 0.8 grams per kilogram of bodyweight per day. For a seventy five kilo adult, that comes out to about sixty grams per day. On paper, that looks reasonable. In practice, it is closer to a survival minimum than a performance or health target.

The key issue is intent. The RDA was created to prevent deficiency, not to optimise muscle, metabolism, or physical function. It answers the question “What is the lowest intake that prevents loss of nitrogen in most people?” It does not answer “What intake helps you stay strong, active, and resilient for decades?”

Another limitation is how the RDA was established. Much of the early work relied on nitrogen balance studies. These studies can show a person as being in balance even while strength, muscle quality, and recovery are quietly declining. Newer research methods, such as indicator amino acid oxidation, consistently point toward higher protein needs than the traditional RDA.

When researchers focus on outcomes that matter in real life, things like muscle mass, strength, physical function, and metabolic health, higher protein intakes perform better. This is true for sedentary people, active people, and athletes. It becomes even more important over forty, when muscle loss accelerates and recovery slows.

Protein requirements do not suddenly spike with age, but the body becomes less responsive to smaller doses. Muscle protein synthesis needs a stronger signal, which means both higher total intake and better distribution across meals. Hitting the RDA often fails to provide that signal, even if calories are adequate.

Protein needs are most accurately based on fat free mass, not total bodyweight, because muscle and other lean tissues are what actually use protein. Someone with more muscle simply needs more protein to maintain and repair it. In practice, measuring fat free mass requires scans or calculations that most people do not have access to, which is why recommendations are usually given per kilogram of bodyweight instead. Using bodyweight is a convenient and practical proxy that works well for most people, especially when protein intake is spread across meals and adjusted based on training load and goals.

This is why higher protein intakes than the RDA are now recommended for everyone, and even more so as we age. A practical evidence based range for general health and muscle retention is around 1.2 to 1.6 grams per kilogram per day. This supports daily function, preserves lean mass, and improves recovery without extremes.

In sports nutrition, recommended intakes often go higher. Intakes up to 2.2 grams per kilogram are commonly used in strength and physique athletes, especially during periods of hard training or fat loss. These levels are well supported in healthy individuals and are not considered excessive in that context.

In my own programming, I typically plan protein intake around 1.8 to 2.0 grams per kilogram, particularly when someone is in a caloric deficit. This helps protect muscle, control hunger, and maintain training quality while body weight is coming down. Cutting calories without raising protein is one of the fastest ways to lose muscle along with fat.

Another problem with the RDA is that it focuses on daily totals and ignores meal structure. Protein works best when it is spread across the day. Meals containing roughly twenty five to forty grams of high quality protein are far more effective at stimulating muscle protein synthesis than loading most of your intake into one meal at night.

Concerns about kidney health are often raised, but in people without existing kidney disease, higher protein intakes have not been shown to impair kidney function. For those with diagnosed kidney conditions, intake should be managed medically. For everyone else, adequate protein supports muscle, bone, immune function, and metabolic health.

The RDA is not wrong. It is just misunderstood. It was never meant to be a target for people who want to be strong, active, and capable. It is a safety net, not a performance recommendation.

If your goal is to maintain muscle, recover well, and support long term health, the better question is not whether you meet the RDA. It is whether you are eating enough protein to support the body you want to keep.

Live better longer.
https://coachharis.com

References

Bauer, J., Biolo, G., Cederholm, T., Cesari, M., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Morley, J. E., Phillips, S. M., Sieber, C., Stehle, P., Teta, D., Visvanathan, R., Volpi, E., & Boirie, Y. (2013). Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14(8), 542–559.

Nowson, C., & O’Connell, S. (2015). Protein requirements and recommendations for older people. Nutrients, 7(8), 6874–6899.

Morton, R. W., Murphy, K. T., McKellar, S. R., Schoenfeld, B. J., Henselmans, M., Helms, E., Aragon, A. A., Devries, M. C., Banfield, L., Krieger, J. W., & Phillips, S. M. (2018). A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of protein supplementation on resistance training–induced gains. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(6), 376–384.

Wolfe, R. R., Cifelli, A. M., Kostas, G., & Kim, I. Y. (2017). Optimizing protein intake in adults. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 20(4), 301–309.

Weiler, M., Layman, D. K., & Wolfe, R. R. (2023). Is it time to reconsider protein recommendations? Nutrients, 15(1), 196.

Phillips, S. M., & Van Loon, L. J. C. (2011).

Dietary protein for athletes: From requirements to optimum adaptation. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(Suppl 1), S29–S38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.619204

Morton, R. W., Murphy, K. T., McKellar, S. R., Schoenfeld, B. J., Henselmans, M., Helms, E., Aragon, A. A., Devries, M. C., Banfield, L., Krieger, J. W., & Phillips, S. M. (2018).